Dillard uses stylistic pick to do her narrative more universally apprehensible. This essay examines four different kingdoms of discourse in item. These kingdoms of discourse are established in the beginning and can be seen once more throughout the essay. As the essay begins. Who knows what he thinks?
|Published (Last):||12 September 2005|
|PDF File Size:||4.81 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.26 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
It is commonly believed that humans are the only animals with souls. The arrangement in this piece is very effective. The story opens with some background information about weasels, including a story of an eagle that was discovered to have a weasel skull attached to it.
Next, the piece moves into a personal narrative of an experience with a weasel, and then the background information and the story of the eagle are alluded to in the conclusion.
By reconnecting the seemingly unrelated background story from the beginning of the piece to the conclusion, the conclusion seems as if it is drawn from more than one just experience with a weasel, and thus, the conclusion becomes stronger. Dillard depicts her encounter with the weasel to show her readers that humans have become too distracted by their freedom of choice.
She is able to convince readers of her claim by shifting tones throughout the piece. Who knows what he thinks? However, once she encounters the weasel, her tone changes; she becomes significantly less dubious.
I think the most influential part of the essay by far is the last paragraph. She encourages readers to learn from her experience with the weasel. Seize it and let it seize you up aloft even, till your eyes burn out and drop. As Dillard continues with her story, she describes a time when she visited a pond close to her house. By describing this moment in her life, the reader of this story is able to immediately recognize the differences between the life of a weasel and the life of a human.
This contrast is essential to understanding the lessons presented later in the story because the reader learns that humans are allowed to choose what they do, while weasels act upon instinct.
The quote tells us that first we have to observe our goal from a distance to ensure we have the skills necessary to accomplish it, then finally, we have to apply ourselves fully, without thinking about or carrying out anything else. The intention of this quote is connected to the intention of the piece as a whole because Dillard wants us, as the reader, to be able to learn from the lifestyle of a weasel. At the start of the essay, she informs the reader that she is fascinated because she is describing to the reader the information she has discovered about weasels and the way in which they live their lives.
Dillard wanted to motivate and persuade her readers into believing that the simple life a weasel lives, by having only a single necessity, is important and often times better than having complete freedom. While Dillard could have just written about we humans should live like weasels, she shows us why she believes this.
This gives the readers insight into her thoughts and how she sees weasels. Within the essay, Dillard walks the reader through her thoughts as she first encounters a weasel. The readers are also able to see how she connects the way weasels live to how she wants to be able to live. It was also a bright blow to the brain, or a sudden beating of brains, with all the charge and intimate grate of rubbed balloons.
When the weasel and Dillard meet eyes, she begins to understand them at a deeper level. I would like to live as I should, as the weasel lives as he should. Dillard wants to live in necessity rather than choice. She wants to rely more on instinct and present happiness than worry about the future. The weasel is less of a fable character and more of a holy figure. He exists for a single perfect moment, much like the way we depict angels as stationary, hyper-perfect beings. Dillard elevates the most repulsive of animals to a holy icon, and the choice is deliberate.
It may not be quite so peachy, though. I ended up doing some further reading on this piece and found a student criticism from an NYU literary magazine.
Analysis Of Annie Dillard 's ' Living Like Weasels '
It is commonly believed that humans are the only animals with souls. The arrangement in this piece is very effective. The story opens with some background information about weasels, including a story of an eagle that was discovered to have a weasel skull attached to it. Next, the piece moves into a personal narrative of an experience with a weasel, and then the background information and the story of the eagle are alluded to in the conclusion. By reconnecting the seemingly unrelated background story from the beginning of the piece to the conclusion, the conclusion seems as if it is drawn from more than one just experience with a weasel, and thus, the conclusion becomes stronger. Dillard depicts her encounter with the weasel to show her readers that humans have become too distracted by their freedom of choice.
Living Like Weasels by Annie Dillard
The thing is to stalk your calling in a certain skilled and supple way, to locate the most tender and live spot and plug into that pulse. Who knows what he thinks? He sleeps in his underground den, his tail draped over his nose. Sometimes he lives in his den for two days without leaving.
Analysis of Annie Dilliard’s “Living Like Weasels” Essay Sample
It starts in when she was five. She grew up in Pittsburgh in the 50s in "a house full of comedians. Her father taught her many useful subjects such as plumbing, economics, and the intricacies of the novel On the Road , though by the end of her adolescence she begins to realize neither of her parents is infallible. In her autobiography, Dillard describes reading a wide variety of subjects including geology, natural history, entomology, epidemiology, and poetry, among others. Among the influential books from her youth were The Natural Way to Draw and Field Book of Ponds and Streams  because they allowed her a way to interact with the present moment and a way of escape, respectively. Her days were filled with exploring, piano and dance classes, rock collecting, bug collecting, drawing, and reading books from the public library including natural history and military history such as World War II. As a child, Dillard attended the Shadyside Presbyterian Church in Pittsburgh , though her parents did not attend.
The story began when she went to Hollins Pond which is a remarkable place of shallowness where she likes to go at sunset and sit on a tree trunk. Dillard traced the motorcycle path in all gratitude through the wild rose up in to high grassy fields and while she was looking down, a weasel caught her eyes attention; he was looking up at her too. The weasel was ten inches long, thin as a curve, a muscled ribbon, brown as fruitwood, soft-furred, and alert. They exchanged the glances as …show more content… Then she began to talk about her own story with weasels, by describing the scene and the place of her story; she explained why did she go to Hollins Pond?